Read the Presentation Given at the Blue Lake Annual Meeting
The local intersections, specifically JW Drive and Highway 82, are already officially documented as operating at a failing capacity, or "Level of Service (LOS) F." Adding an estimated 1,000+ daily vehicle trips to a dead-stop intersection will gridlock the corridor, delaying fire engines and ambulances when seconds count.
Until Highway 82's capacity and local infrastructure (such as intersections and roads) are proven to handle additional growth, Save Mid-Valley opposes further development.
The proposed El Jebel (EJ) Crossing development poses a significant threat to our local infrastructure, specifically the roadway network that is already struggling to handle current traffic volumes.
A Gridlocked Bottleneck at JW Drive and Highway 82 The local intersections surrounding the proposed site, most notably the junction of JW Drive and Highway 82, are officially documented as operating at a failing capacity. The developer's own Traffic Impact Study admits that the Northbound approach (Valley Road) currently operates at a "Level of Service (LOS) F," meaning it experiences an average delay of nearly 90 seconds and is essentially at a dead stop during peak hours. The study also projects that this intersection will remain at LOS F in 2028 and 2050.
Adding 1,000+ Daily Trips to a Failing System Despite this existing failure, the developer has recently expanded their project from 111 units to 163 units—a massive 46% increase in density. This expansion is estimated to add nearly 1,000 daily vehicle trips directly onto these failing roads.
Dumping this massive volume of new traffic into an already dead-stop intersection will completely gridlock the corridor. This isn't just an inconvenience; it's a severe public safety issue. When intersections are gridlocked, fire engines, ambulances, and police vehicles are delayed when every single second counts.
Dangerous Requests to Waive Safety Codes The developer is requesting a "Variance from Improvement Standards" (VIS). This is a formal request to bypass critical Eagle County safety codes, including standard right-of-way and road widths.
They are asking for these waivers because "no intersection improvements or modifications are anticipated" despite the failing grades at surrounding intersections.
Conclusion We cannot allow the County to waive basic safety requirements just to fit a massive development onto a site with failing roads. The EJ Crossing project is simply too large for our current infrastructure, and approving it would permanently damage the safety and efficiency of our community.
El Jebel Crossing Traffic Impact - Public Documents & Resources
Below is a curated collection of official records, traffic studies, agency communications, and technical analyses regarding the El Jebel Crossing development application.
Key Reports & Primary Studies
June 2026 Traffic Impact Study: The revised official traffic study detailing trip generation estimates and code classifications for the updated 163-unit development proposal.
Application Overview & Traffic Issues Summary: A comprehensive breakdown of the proposal highlighting key community and safety concerns regarding projected traffic volume.
Intersection Level of Service (LOS) F Analysis: Documentation showing how project traffic impact leads to failing operational performance (Level of Service F) at key regional intersections.
Study Methodology & Technical Analysis
Transportation Impact Study Methodology Form: The official methodology framework document submitted regarding traffic study assumptions and guidelines.
Critical Analysis of TIS Methodology Form: An in-depth evaluation examining discrepancies in land use codes, ITE 223 assumptions, and trip calculation methodologies
Official Agency Correspondence & Records
Traffic Calculation Discussion & CDOT Coordination (June 2025 - April 2026): Email records covering discussions between Sopris Engineering, Kimley-Horn, and CDOT regarding the 20% traffic threshold and access permit requirements.
TIS Methodology Email Records (May 2026): Correspondence between Eagle County and CDOT regarding ITE Code 223 objections, peak hour calculation rules, and state access permitting triggers.
Public Records Archive
June CORA Request Traffic Document Archive: Google Drive folder containing the complete set of public records and traffic documents obtained via the June CORA request.